<h2>Campaign Events</h2>

Events

Footer

News Post

<h2>Royal's Weekly Brief</h2>Florida's 11th District Updates From the Campaign Trail

Announcement

<h2>Headline Text Here</h2>

<h2>Why I'm Running?</h2><img src="https://run.imgix.net/655a209d-4612-44fa-b4b6-948631052720/65ae5c73-f2c1-421f-b4ae-a732b21b15e8/65ae5c73-f2c1-421f-b4ae-a732b21b15e8.jpg?ixlib=js-3.8.0&amp;bri=0&amp;con=0&amp;sat=0&amp;high=0&amp;shad=0&amp;usm=0&amp;rect=0%2C0%2C960%2C720&amp;w=1500" alt="" caption="" align="left" alignwidth="50" variant="base"><h4>I’ve spent my life in service — first to my country as a U.S. Army soldier, and now to my community as a teacher and coach. I’ve seen what can be accomplished when people lead with honesty, empathy, and courage. I’m running for Congress because I believe leadership is not about titles or attention, it’s about action, character, and consistency.</h4>

Text

<h1>Donate</h1>

Header

<h1>News</h1>

<h4>Royal’s Recap will continue to monitor these developments and provide concise, fact-based updates on the issues that matter and might have been less reported.</h4>

<h2>A Candidate Story About Roots, Service, and Belonging</h2>

<h2>Get Involved!</h2>

Long Form

Introduce the videos below with a short blurb.

<h2>Campaign Videos</h2>

<h4>Celebrating Coach Royal Webster and 50 years of coaching basketball!</h4>Coaching basketball has been a part of who I am for the last 50 years. I was just 13 years old when Mr. Dick Barth asked me to coach a 10-and-under team. He explained that many of the players didn’t have an adult male in their lives, and knowing I had lost my father to cancer five years earlier, he believed I could connect with them. He was right. That team went on to win the Tamiami League 10U Championship—and I was hooked. From that moment on, I’ve been blessed with the opportunity to coach boys, girls, women, and men at nearly every level of the game. Somewhere along the way, I learned that winning is simply a byproduct of doing everything else right—and that the people I coached always mattered far more than any scoreboard. On March 23rd, I officially stepped down as an Assistant Boys Basketball Coach at Lake Highland. The most constant part of my life is now behind me. Much to my surprise, a video was created highlighting a small piece of those 50 years. In it, many people thank me—but the truth is, I’m the one who is most grateful.If you want to know what kind of Congressman I would be, just ask any of the players I’ve coached.

Video

<h2>My Story</h2><h4>Every day, I see families working hard, students chasing dreams, and small business owners doing their best to stay afloat. Too many feel unheard or left behind by a government that should serve them. I want to change that. I believe in creating solutions through understanding, listening first, acting with compassion, and standing firm on principle.</h4><h5> I’m committed to leading with a consistent plan of action that puts people before politics, strengthens our economy, and restores trust in public service. That includes supporting bipartisan efforts like the Restore Trust in Congress Act, which promotes transparency and accountability in Washington. </h5><h5>I’m running because I believe in honesty over rhetoric, empathy over division, and courage over complacency. Titles and words fade, they get lost in the wind, but our actions and our service define us.</h5><h5>God bless you, and God bless the United States of America.</h5>

Join us in supporting Royal Webster, a dedicated Democrat Congressional Candidate in Florida's 11th Congressional District.Royal Webster embodies the values of courage, integrity, and dedication. With a lifetime of service to his country as an Army Veteran, a Coach and a Classroom Teacher, Royal understands the dedication and persistence needed to bring change and leadership to this district. Together, we can make a positive change for our district and our country.

Page Intro

<h1>Events</h1>

A Candidate Story About Roots, Service, and Belonging

<h2>Royal Webster’s America: Cuban Roots, Army Service, and a Campaign That Starts With Listening </h2>

<h4>Video Title</h4>Put your video description here.

"Royal Webster has devoted his life to serving others — not for recognition, but because service is at the core of who he is. I have no doubt that he will bring that same heart, commitment, and sense of purpose to his work in Congress." - William H. Morgan, Esquire

Quote

<h1>Issues</h1>

Events Post

So much is happening right now. Write a couple lines to get your readers excited for it.

<h2>In a world of nonstop headlines, more information isn’t always better. Royal’s Recap offers seven carefully chosen updates each week—stories that matter, stories that may have flown under the radar, and stories that help you understand what’s really happening beyond the headlines. </h2>

News

<h1>Contact</h1>

All donations are made through ActBlue.

<h2>Support Our Campaign!</h2>

<h4>Contribute now to support our campaign!</h4>

Landing Popup

<h1>Courage. Country. Constitution.</h1>

<h2>We’ll respond asap!</h2>

<h1>About</h1>

<h2>Endorsements</h2>

Gallery

Issues Post

<h1>Volunteer</h1>

<h2>How to handle donations on your website</h2>Run does not process donations directly on our platform, as is standard with most political and advocacy sites.Campaigns are often required to comply with reporting requirements, donation limits, and other regulations, so using a donation processor that specializes in serving campaigns is generally a good idea. Sign up with a donation processor and then on your Pages sidebar, click the Link icon on the Donate page and add the link to your donation page. Some common options for donation processing include:<ul><li><a href="https://secure.actblue.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">ActBlue</a></li><li><a href="https://www.campaigndeputy.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Campaign Deputy</a> </li><li><a href="https://goodchange.app/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">GoodChange</a></li><li><a href="https://numero.ai/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Numero</a></li><li><a href="https://www.ngpvan.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">NGP VAN</a></li></ul>

"I had the privilege of working with Coach Royal Webster throughout middle and high school, and he truly changed my life. He taught us the value of hard work on the court and how to grow as men off the court, always leading by example and guiding us in the right direction." - Brice Sensabaugh

I have been very fortunate to travel our country and the world, and through those experiences, my perspective of America has continued to grow and evolve. I’ve seen firsthand how deeply connected our world has become and how isolationism is not the way forward. The United States must continue to lead as a champion of freedom, democracy, and economic strength, but that cannot happen by raising tariffs, alienating our allies, or driving trading partners to take their business elsewhere; leadership means building bridges, not burning them. Unfortunately, the current President’s economic decisions and moral failures threaten to undo decades of progress, and a man who has bankrupted multiple companies now risks bankrupting American families — and if left unchecked, could do lasting damage to our nation. It is time for Congress to reclaim its constitutional authority and restore accountability to the highest levels of government, and we must have the courage to stand up for what’s right, stop this economic and moral decline, and bring integrity, responsibility, and balance back to Washington. Our future depends on leadership that unites rather than divides — leadership that puts country over party and service over self‑interest.

<h2>Our Campaign’s Top Initiatives</h2>

Issues

Donate

Contact

Home

About

Volunteer

1. Outreach and Information<ul><li>Create a team of VA workers who actively reach out to homeless veterans in shelters, community centers, and on the streets.</li><li>Make clear, simple guides and flyers explaining VA programs like healthcare, housing help, jobs, and mental health services.</li><li>Use phones, social media, and text alerts to keep veterans informed about programs and events.</li></ul>2. Easier Enrollment<ul><li>Set up one-stop centers where veterans can sign up for multiple programs at once.</li><li>Give each veteran a case manager or navigator to help with forms, documents, and eligibility questions.</li><li>Use mobile enrollment units to reach veterans who cannot travel to VA offices.</li></ul>3. Work with Community Partners<ul><li>Team up with shelters, nonprofits, and veteran organizations to find veterans who need help.</li><li>Train community staff to correctly refer veterans to VA services.</li><li>Track referrals to make sure no veteran is missed.</li></ul>4. Improve Programs<ul><li>Ask homeless veterans for feedback to find gaps in services.</li><li>Expand housing-first programs, providing stable homes before addressing other needs.</li><li>Increase support for mental health, addiction recovery, and job training programs for veterans.</li><li>Use program data to make regular improvements to services.</li></ul>5. Awareness and Support<ul><li>Hold outreach events and workshops to explain benefits and eligibility.</li><li>Provide transportation for veterans to reach VA offices or program locations.</li><li>Connect veterans with peer mentors who have successfully used VA programs to encourage participation.</li></ul>

Write a short blurb about an issue your campaign is highlighting. Try to keep the text a similar size between the various issue blurbs.

<h2>Helping Homeless Veterans Access VA Programs</h2>

<h4>Since late 2025, oil imports from Venezuela and Mexico have dropped sharply or stopped altogether, leaving the island without enough fuel to maintain electricity generation, transportation, and industry. The impact is visible in daily life. Rolling blackouts affect homes, hospitals, and schools, with some areas receiving power for only a few hours a day. Jet fuel shortages have forced airports to halt refueling, leading to airline cancellations and further damaging tourism, once a major source of revenue.</h4><h4> Fuel scarcity has raised prices on the informal market and caused long lines at gas stations. Rationing has pushed many residents to walk or rely on limited public transport, increasing strain on food distribution and public health services. External assistance has been limited. Mexico has sent humanitarian aid, but it does not address core energy needs. Without sustained fuel imports or long-term energy diversification, experts warn Cuba’s economic and social pressures will continue to grow. </h4>

Cuba is facing a deepening energy and economic crisis driven by fuel shortages, supply disruptions, and aging infrastructure.

Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has b

<h4>Cuba Crisis</h4>

<h4>In the past, new ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers typically went through multi-month training, often including a combination of language instruction and law enforcement curriculum that could last around five months before field duties.</h4><h4> Over the past year, that training has been significantly reduced as part of a broader hiring surge. By late 2025 and into early 2026, investigative reporting found that the length of academy training for ERO officers has been cut to roughly eight weeks — about 47-48 training days if counted on a six-day-a-week schedule.² Some outlets have reported even shorter time frames, closer to six weeks, though official Department of Homeland Security sources have not confirmed exact day counts.</h4><h4> In contrast to earlier, longer training periods, the newer, shorter program is designed to move officers into field assignments more quickly amid rapid workforce expansion. This has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and analysts concerned about readiness and preparedness for complex enforcement duties.</h4>

In the past, new ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations (ERO) officers typically went through multi-month training, often including a combination of language instruction and law enforcement curriculum that could last around five months before field duties. Over the past year, that training has been significantly reduced as part of a broader hiring surge.

<h4>Lowering ICE Training Standards</h4>

<h4>Another clear indication that some in Congress prioritize protecting the guilty over delivering justice to victims. Virginia’s Law is a federal bill introduced on February 10, 2026, by Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and Representative Teresa Leger Fernández with support from survivors of sexual abuse and trafficking, including the family of Virginia Giuffre, a prominent Epstein accuser who died in 2025. Its aim is to eliminate the statute of limitations for civil lawsuits relating to sexual abuse and trafficking at the federal level, meaning survivors could pursue legal action regardless of how long ago the abuse occurred.</h4><h4> The bill is currently stalled in committee because both the House and Senate are controlled by Republicans, and it faces skepticism from lawmakers concerned about potential legal and financial implications, including a possible surge in litigation. Without broad bipartisan support, the legislation has not yet moved forward to a floor vote, leaving its prospects uncertain. </h4>

Another clear indication that some in Congress prioritize protecting the guilty over delivering justice to victims.

<h4>Virginia’s Law</h4>

Here is a verified list of colleges and universities that, according to media reporting and preliminary lists circulating following a Department of Defense memo on February 13–14, 2026, are considered “moderate to high risk” of becoming ineligible for DoD Tuition Assistance for active-duty service members beginning with the 2026–2027 academic year. The guidance emerged as the Pete Hegseth-led DoD directed military branches to review programs for quality and alignment with Defense educational needs. Institutions identified on preliminary “at risk” lists. * American University * Boston College * Boston University * Brown University * Carnegie Mellon University * Case Western Reserve University * Columbia University * College of William &amp; Mary * Cornell University * Duke University * Emory University * Florida Institute of Technology * Fordham University * Georgetown University * George Washington University * Harvard University * Hawaii Pacific University * Johns Hopkins University * London School of Economics and Political Science * Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) * Northeastern University * Northwestern University * New York University (NYU) * Pepperdine University * Princeton University * Stanford University * Tufts University * University of Miami * University of Pennsylvania * University of Southern California (USC) * Vanderbilt University * Wake Forest University * Washington University in St. Louis * Yale University Important context: These lists were compiled by military branches and circulated internally as part of the review process. They have not yet been published as an official DoD policy list, and service members are still seeking clarification from DoD and their Education Service Officers about final eligibility.

Here is a verified list of colleges and universities that, according to media reporting and preliminary lists circulating following a Department of Defense memo on February 13–14, 2026, are considered “moderate to high risk” of becoming ineligible for DoD Tuition Assistance for active-duty service members beginning with the 2026–2027 academic year.

<h4>Education Under Attack Again</h4>

<h4>Purpose</h4>This Act restores Congress’s constitutional authority over tariffs and trade duties, reversing decades of delegated power to the Executive Branch under the Trade Act of 1974. It ensures that no tariff changes take effect without direct approval from Congress, strengthening accountability and transparency.Why This Matters<ul><li>The U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8) clearly grants Congress—not the President—the power to set tariffs and collect duties.</li><li>Since 1974, presidents of both parties have used expanded powers to impose tariffs unilaterally, often without congressional input.</li><li>This bill rebalances power, bringing trade decisions back under the direct control of the people’s representatives.</li></ul>Key Provisions1. Repeal of Delegated Powers<ul><li>Strikes sections of the Trade Act of 1974 that allow presidents to impose, modify, or suspend tariffs without congressional approval.</li><li>Ends “fast track” authority that bypasses normal congressional procedures for trade agreements.</li></ul>2. Congressional Approval Required<ul><li>Tariffs, duties, or trade-related imposts can only be created, changed, or removed by an Act of Congress.</li><li>Existing tariffs remain in place unless Congress votes to adjust them.</li></ul>3. Executive Role Maintained, But Limited<ul><li>Presidents may still negotiate trade agreements with foreign nations.</li><li>However, agreements that change tariffs or duties must be ratified by Congress through standard legislative procedure.</li></ul>4. Effective Date<ul><li>Takes effect January 1, 2027, allowing time for transition.</li></ul>Impact<ul><li>Restores Constitutional Balance: Reinforces Congress’s exclusive power to regulate trade and duties.</li><li>Increases Accountability: Elected officials—not a single executive—must approve tariff changes.</li><li>Strengthens Transparency: Trade policies will go through public congressional debate and voting.</li><li>Predictability for Businesses: Reduces abrupt tariff changes driven by executive action alone.</li></ul>118th CONGRESS1st SessionA BILL To restore congressional authority over the approval of tariffs and trade duties by repealing certain provisions of the Trade Act of 1974, and for other purposes.Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.This Act may be cited as the “Congressional Tariff Authority Restoration Act of 2027.”SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE.Congress finds the following:<ol><li>Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution vests in Congress the power “to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises.”</li><li>Since the enactment of the Trade Act of 1974, successive administrations have exercised broad unilateral authority to adjust tariffs, impose duties, and enter trade agreements.</li><li>This delegation of authority has reduced congressional oversight and weakened accountability to the American people.</li><li>Restoring tariff and trade-duty authority to Congress is necessary to ensure transparency, constitutional balance, and proper representation of domestic economic interests.</li></ol>Purpose.—The purpose of this Act is to repeal provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 that delegate tariff-making powers to the Executive Branch and reestablish the sole authority of Congress to approve tariffs.SEC. 3. REPEAL OF EXECUTIVE AUTHORITY UNDER THE TRADE ACT OF 1974.(a) Repeal.—The following provisions of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) are repealed:<ol><li>Title II, Part 1, relating to presidential authority to impose, modify, or suspend tariffs.</li><li>Title III, relating to trade agreement implementation procedures granting “fast track” or expedited authority.</li><li>Any other provision of the Trade Act of 1974 inconsistent with the congressional authority to approve tariffs.</li></ol>(b) Termination of Delegated Authorities.—Any authority granted to the President under the Trade Act of 1974 to adjust tariffs, duties, or import restrictions shall cease to be effective on the date of enactment of this Act.SEC. 4. CONGRESSIONAL APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR TARIFF CHANGES.(a) In General.—No tariff, duty, or trade-related impost may be imposed, modified, or repealed except by an Act of Congress.(b) Existing Tariffs.—Tariffs and duties in effect on the date of enactment shall remain in force unless changed by Congress under subsection (a).SEC. 5. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent the Executive Branch from negotiating trade agreements. However, no such agreement shall have legal effect with respect to tariffs or duties unless approved by Congress through regular legislative procedure.SEC. 6. EFFECTIVE DATE.This Act shall take effect as soon as passed.&nbsp;

<h2>Congressional Tariff Authority Restoration Act of 2027</h2>

The Department of Education (DOE) needs to be rebuilt so it can better protect the rights of students with special needs and make sure all students are measured by the same standard. Right now, every state has its own rules and its own tests, which makes it hard to compare student learning across the country. My plan would keep local control over curriculum but create one national standard for measuring proficiency.Special Needs ProtectionsOne of the biggest problems today is that many students with disabilities do not get the services they are guaranteed under the law. The DOE would create a new office focused only on making sure schools follow special education laws. This office would have investigators to look into complaints, help families, and make sure schools provide Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) on time. Schools that ignore these laws could face penalties, while schools that meet the rules would get more support.National Proficiency StandardInstead of 50 different sets of rules, the DOE would set one standard of proficiency for the entire country. To measure this, students would take national tests in grades 3, 5, 8, 11, and 12. States would still give their own tests in the other years, but they would have to align them with the national standard. This way, we could finally compare results fairly across all states. Students with disabilities would have full access to accommodations like extra time, technology help, or alternate assessments.Funding and IncentivesFederal money would be tied to student performance. States would have two choices to qualify for funding:<ol><li>Show that at least 50% of students are meeting proficiency on the national standard, or</li><li>Agree to adopt the DOE’s recommended curriculum and improvement plan.</li></ol>States that fall short would not be punished right away. Instead, they would receive extra support, training, and resources to help them catch up. States and districts that make fast progress—especially with special needs students—could receive bonus funding.Role of DOE in CurriculumThe DOE would not tell states what to teach. Instead, it would provide guidance and recommended resources if states ask for help. This keeps local control in place but still allows for consistent measurement nationwide.Timeline<ul><li>Year 1: DOE restructures and new offices are set up.</li><li>Year 2: Pilot national tests and begin stronger enforcement of special education laws.</li><li>Year 3: Full national testing begins in grades 3 and 5.</li><li>Year 4–5: Expand national tests to grades 8, 11, and 12. Funding incentives begin.</li></ul>This plan balances local control with national accountability. It makes sure students with disabilities are supported, while also giving every state the same measure of success. By aligning standards, strengthening special education protections, and rewarding progress, the DOE can help prepare all students to succeed.

<h2>Plan to Rebuild the Department of Education (DOE)</h2>

<h2>Literacy 2040: A National Commitment to Functional Literacy</h2><h4> Vision and Purpose:</h4><h5>Literacy 2040 is a nationwide initiative built on a simple but urgent goal: every student graduating in the year 2040 and beyond will achieve functional literacy at or above a 9th-grade level. Today, national assessments show that roughly 20–28% of U.S. adults read below a 5th-grade level, limiting their access to jobs, civic participation, and economic mobility. Literacy 2040 confronts this challenge directly by reforming how reading is taught, supported, and measured from early childhood through high school. This initiative recognizes that literacy is not just an education issue—it is an economic, workforce, and democratic necessity. </h5><h5>Core Strategy: Systemic Reform, Not Isolated Fixes Literacy 2040 focuses on long-term, system-wide change, not short-term interventions. The initiative emphasizes: * Evidence-based reading instruction grounded in the science of reading * Early identification and intervention * Strong teacher training and support * Family and community engagement * Transparent progress tracking and accountability The ultimate target is 97% literacy proficiency by 2040, with measurable benchmarks along the way. Program Pillars: 1. Nation Reads 2040 (Grades K–5): Nation Reads 2040 builds the foundation for lifelong reading success by focusing on early literacy. Key Components: * Daily phonics-based instruction aligned with evidence-based practices * Nationwide reading challenges to encourage engagement and consistency * Federal grants to expand and modernize school libraries * Gamified literacy apps to build vocabulary and fluency * Community read-aloud events involving parents, libraries, and volunteers Goal: Prevent reading failure before it begins by ensuring students leave elementary school reading at grade level or higher. 2. Proficiency 2040 (Grades 6–8): Proficiency 2040 addresses the critical middle-school years, when students shift from “learning to read” to “reading to learn.” Key Components: * Leveled comprehension benchmarks aligned with national and international literacy standards * Adaptive digital platforms that personalize reading support * Professional development for teachers focused on comprehension, analysis, and critical reading * School-wide progress dashboards for administrators to identify and close literacy gaps Goal: Ensure students enter high school prepared for complex texts across subjects. 3. Class 2040 Literate (Grades 11–12): Class 2040 Literate focuses on older students who are at risk of graduating without functional literacy. Key Components: * Intensive summer literacy boot camps for struggling readers * Peer tutoring and mentoring programs * Career-linked reading modules, including job applications, workplace manuals, contracts, and technical texts * Partnerships with local employers and workforce programs Goal: Guarantee that no student graduates unprepared for work, college, or civic life. Teacher Training and Support: Teachers are the backbone of Literacy 2040. * Federal funding for science-of-reading certification programs * Ongoing professional development tied to classroom outcomes * Literacy coaching positions embedded in schools * Reduced administrative burden so teachers can focus on instruction Family and Community Engagement: Literacy does not stop at the classroom door. * Family engagement apps that track student progress and suggest at-home activities * Multilingual resources to support diverse communities * Partnerships with libraries, nonprofits, and faith-based organizations Funding and Accountability: Literacy 2040 can be funded through a combination of: * Federal education grants tied to literacy benchmarks * Reallocation of existing literacy and workforce development funds * Public-private partnerships with publishers, technology firms, and foundations * State matching funds incentivized through federal performance grants National Assessment Development</h5><h5> As part of Literacy 2040, the U.S. Department of Education would develop high-quality, optional national assessments in literacy and other core subjects. These exams would be offered to states at no cost, giving them access to reliable, research-based measures without requiring the purchase of expensive testing products from private companies.</h5><h5> States would retain full authority over whether and how to use these assessments, preserving local control while reducing financial burden. This approach would save states millions of dollars annually, create consistent national benchmarks, and redirect funds back into classrooms rather than corporate contracts. Accountability should serve students and teachers—not function as a profit center. Accountability Measures</h5><h5> * Annual literacy assessments at key grade levels * Public reporting of progress at the school, district, and state level * Funding incentives tied to measurable improvement, not punishment * Independent oversight to ensure transparency and equity Why Literacy 2040 Matters: A literate nation is a stronger nation. Literacy 2040 strengthens: * Workforce readiness * Economic competitiveness * Civic engagement and informed citizenship * Long-term social mobility This initiative does not lower standards—it raises them. It does not blame students or teachers—it equips them. And it does not accept literacy gaps as inevitable—it treats them as solvable. Closing: Literacy 2040 is a commitment to our future. By acting now, we can ensure that the class of 2040—and every class after—graduates not just with a diploma, but with the reading skills necessary to thrive in a modern democracy.</h5><img src="https://run.imgix.net/655a209d-4612-44fa-b4b6-948631052720/4a3cb9b6-b75b-420d-9695-e9840d3576fb/4a3cb9b6-b75b-420d-9695-e9840d3576fb.png?ixlib=js-3.8.0&amp;bri=0&amp;con=0&amp;sat=0&amp;high=0&amp;shad=0&amp;usm=0&amp;rect=0%2C37%2C1086%2C1356&amp;w=1500" alt="" caption="" align="center" alignwidth="50" variant="base">

<h2>Project Literacy 2040</h2>

<h4>Facing potential crop stress, farmers improvised by using rainwater barrels and swapping practical tips at a local cooperative meeting. County agricultural extension agents worked quickly to reroute half the funds from existing reserves, providing partial relief and helping ease immediate drought concerns. While the workaround helped, growers voiced frustration over application delays, urging a more streamlined process for future grant cycles. Despite the hiccup, the county’s farming community demonstrated resilience and collaboration, and the extension office commended the innovative response. No formal alerts were issued by the broader Farm Bureau, but local farmers continue advocating for smoother support mechanisms to prevent similar setbacks </h4>

Sumter County’s small farms hit a snag when a $150,000 state agriculture grant for irrigation upgrades arrived too late, missing the critical planting window for approximately 40 growers in Bushnell.

<h4>Sumter Farms Grant Snag</h4>

Year 1: Foundations and Policy Reform<ol><li>Secure Funding</li></ol><ul><li>Fully fund state-level housing trust funds and protect them from being diverted for other uses.</li><li>Expand use of HUD programs such as HOME, CDBG, and Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC).</li><li>Dedicate a share of local taxes (sales tax, property tax surcharges, or tourism taxes in major cities) to affordable housing.</li></ul><ol><li>Zoning &amp; Land Use Changes</li></ol><ul><li>Reform zoning laws to allow multi-family housing and high-density units in more districts.</li><li>Establish fast-track permitting for affordable housing projects.</li><li>Require inclusionary zoning policies, where developers must reserve a percentage of units for low- and middle-income residents.</li></ul>Year 2: Partnerships and Pilot Projects<ol><li>Employer Partnerships</li></ol><ul><li>Major employers (hospitals, universities, corporations) partner with city governments to fund workforce housing near job hubs.</li><li>Launch Community Land Trusts (CLTs) in urban neighborhoods to keep housing affordable long-term.</li></ul><ol><li>Building Conversions</li></ol><ul><li>Identify underused hotels, motels, and office buildings in city centers.</li><li>Convert these into micro-apartments, studios, and 1-bedroom units for workers, veterans, and seniors.</li><li>Use HUD Section 108 Loan Guarantees, federal infrastructure funds, and state grants to finance conversions.</li></ul>Year 3: Scaling Up Affordable Development<ol><li>Large-Scale Development</li></ol><ul><li>Use LIHTC incentives to build thousands of new affordable units across metro areas.</li><li>Require mixed-use and transit-oriented developments to dedicate at least 15% of units to affordable housing.</li></ul><ol><li>Repurposing Vacant Spaces</li></ol><ul><li>Transform empty malls, warehouses, and big-box retail stores into affordable apartments.</li><li>Encourage Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) by offering tax credits to homeowners who build secondary housing on their property.</li></ul>Year 4: Preservation &amp; Stability<ol><li>Preserve Existing Housing</li></ol><ul><li>Create rehabilitation funds for landlords who agree to cap rents in exchange for repair subsidies.</li><li>Strengthen tenant protections against sudden rent increases and unfair evictions.</li></ul><ol><li>Community-Based Housing Models</li></ol><ul><li>Support Habitat for Humanity-style builds in city neighborhoods.</li><li>Expand housing cooperatives in urban centers, giving residents shared ownership and decision-making power.</li></ul>Year 5: Long-Term Sustainability<ol><li>Innovation</li></ol><ul><li>Invest in prefabricated and modular housing factories within metropolitan regions to reduce construction costs.</li><li>Pilot green and energy-efficient housing projects (solar, energy-sharing grids, and water-saving designs) to cut utility costs for low-income tenants.</li></ul><ol><li>Regional or Multi-City Housing Authorities</li></ol><ul><li>Establish regional housing authorities in major metro areas to coordinate funding, zoning, and accountability across city and county lines.</li></ul>Expected Results by Year 5<ul><li>Tens of thousands of new affordable housing units through new builds and adaptive reuse of existing spaces.</li><li>Stabilized rents and reduced displacement for working families, seniors, and veterans.</li><li>Strong partnerships with employers and nonprofits to keep housing near job centers.</li><li>A sustainable, long-term housing pipeline supported by federal, state, and local resources.</li></ul><h4>How it would look in Central Florida:</h4>Central Florida Affordable Housing Roadmap(Orange, Osceola, Lake, Polk &amp; Sumter Counties)Year 1: Foundations and Policy Reform<ol><li>Secure Funding</li></ol><ul><li>Fully fund the Sadowski Affordable Housing Trust Fund.</li><li>Apply for HUD programs such as HOME, CDBG, and LIHTC credits.</li><li>Dedicate a portion of the tourism development tax (generated by Orlando-area tourism, including Kissimmee and Osceola resorts) toward affordable housing.</li></ul><ol><li>Zoning &amp; Land Use Changes</li></ol><ul><li>Update county zoning laws across Orange, Osceola, Lake, Polk, and Sumter to allow more multi-family housing.</li><li>Create fast-track permitting for affordable housing projects.</li><li>Implement inclusionary zoning requiring developers to reserve a percentage of units for affordable housing.</li></ul>Year 2: Partnerships and Pilot Projects<ol><li>Employer Partnerships</li></ol><ul><li>Disney, Universal, AdventHealth, and other major employers co-fund workforce housing near job hubs in Orange, Osceola, and Polk Counties.</li><li>Establish Community Land Trusts (CLTs) across all five counties to ensure long-term affordability.</li></ul><ol><li>Hotel &amp; Timeshare Conversions</li></ol><ul><li>Identify underperforming hotels and motels along International Drive, Kissimmee (Osceola), Clermont, and Lakeland.</li><li>Convert them into studio and 1-bedroom units for workers, veterans, and seniors.</li><li>Use HUD Section 108 Loan Guarantees and state grants to finance conversions.</li></ul>Year 3: Scaling Up Affordable Development<ol><li>Large-Scale Development</li></ol><ul><li>Use LIHTC incentives to create 1,000+ affordable units spread across Orange, Osceola, Lake, Polk, and Sumter Counties.</li><li>Require mixed-use and transit-oriented developments to dedicate at least 15% of units to affordable housing.</li></ul><ol><li>Reuse of Vacant Spaces</li></ol><ul><li>Repurpose vacant malls, aging office buildings, and big-box retail stores in Orlando, Kissimmee, Clermont, and Lakeland into affordable housing.</li><li>Encourage Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) with tax credits for homeowners across all five counties.</li></ul>Year 4: Preservation &amp; Stability<ol><li>Preserve Existing Housing</li></ol><ul><li>Create a rehabilitation fund for landlords in all counties who agree to cap rents and keep units affordable.</li><li>Strengthen tenant protections against extreme rent hikes and unfair evictions.</li></ul><ol><li>Community-Based Housing Models</li></ol><ul><li>Expand Habitat for Humanity builds in rural areas of Lake, Polk, Osceola, and Sumter Counties.</li><li>Support housing cooperatives in Orange and Osceola urban centers.</li></ul>Year 5: Long-Term Sustainability<ol><li>Innovation</li></ol><ul><li>Invest in prefabricated and modular housing factories within Central Florida to reduce building costs.</li><li>Pilot green energy housing projects (solar panels, PaveGen walkways in high-traffic areas like Disney Springs, downtown Orlando, and Kissimmee) to lower living costs for residents.</li></ul><ol><li>Regional Affordable Housing Authority</li></ol><ul><li>Establish a multi-county housing authority for Orange, Osceola, Lake, Polk, and Sumter Counties to oversee funding, zoning, and accountability.</li></ul>Expected Results by Year 5<ul><li>Thousands of new affordable units created through both new builds and conversions.</li><li>Stabilized rents for working families, seniors, and veterans.</li><li>Stronger employer investment in housing near major job centers like Orlando and Kissimmee.</li><li>A sustainable pipeline of affordable housing supported by federal programs, state trust funds, and tourism revenue.</li></ul>

<h2>Urban Affordable Housing Roadmap (U.S. Cities)</h2>

<h4>Uncapping the House refers to a proposed reform to increase the number of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives beyond its current fixed limit of 435 members.</h4><h4> History: The House size was capped at 435 by the Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929, following disputes over urban vs. rural representation after the 1920 census. Before that, Congress had gradually expanded seats with population growth, but gridlock led to the permanent freeze.</h4><h4> Current Issue: Today, each representative serves about 760,000 people on average, diluting individual voter influence compared to the Founders’ vision of the House as the “people’s house.” Proponents argue this favors lobbyists and donors over average citizens. </h4><h4>Proposed Solution: Advocates, like the No Cap Fund, push the “Wyoming Rule,” which would base seats on the smallest state’s population (around 580,000 per district), potentially expanding to 574 seats. This could improve responsiveness without a constitutional amendment, though Congress must approve changes post-census.</h4><img src="https://run.imgix.net/655a209d-4612-44fa-b4b6-948631052720/8bd56248-cb20-44da-a995-6f268e3f8325/8bd56248-cb20-44da-a995-6f268e3f8325.png?ixlib=js-3.8.0&amp;bri=0&amp;con=0&amp;sat=0&amp;high=0&amp;shad=0&amp;usm=0&amp;rect=0%2C0%2C605%2C455&amp;w=1500" alt="" caption="" align="left" alignwidth="50" variant="framed"> <h4>This bar graph shows how dramatically the U.S. population has grown while the House has remained fixed at 435 seats since 1929.</h4>

<h2>I Support Uncapping The House</h2>

Section 1. Title This Act may be cited as the Digital Literacy and Responsible Media Act of 2027.Section 2. Purpose The purpose of this Act is to promote responsible online engagement, protect vulnerable populations from demonstrably false or harmful content, and improve digital literacy for all Americans while preserving the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.Section 3. Definitions<ol><li>Digital literacy – The ability to access, understand, evaluate, and responsibly create or share content online.</li><li>Minor – Any individual under the age of 18.</li><li>Misinformation – Verifiably false or misleading content that could cause tangible harm to individuals or society.</li><li>Platform – Any online service that hosts or distributes user-generated content to the public.</li></ol>Section 4. Responsibilities of Online Platforms<ol><li>Platforms shall implement transparent measures to identify and limit the spread of demonstrably false or harmful content.</li><li>Platforms shall provide clear reporting mechanisms for users to flag misinformation.</li><li>Platforms shall develop educational resources for minors and guardians about online safety, misinformation, and responsible media use.</li><li>Platforms shall submit annual reports to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on content moderation and educational initiatives.</li></ol>Section 5. Education and Media Literacy Programs<ol><li>The Department of Education (DOE), in coordination with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), shall establish age-appropriate digital literacy curricula for minors, focusing on evaluating content, critical thinking, and online safety.</li><li>Public libraries, community centers, and adult education programs shall provide digital literacy training for individuals aged 30 and above who wish to improve their understanding of online risks, misinformation, and media safeguards.</li><li>Programs shall include guidance on responsible social media use, recognizing misinformation, and reporting harmful content.</li><li>Grants and funding shall be available for local organizations and institutions implementing digital literacy programs aligned with this Act.</li></ol>Section 6. Public Awareness and Support<ol><li>The federal government shall fund campaigns to increase awareness of misinformation and promote responsible online behavior.</li><li>Resources and toolkits shall be made publicly available to assist families, educators, and community organizations in fostering critical thinking and safe online habits.</li></ol>Section 7. Research and Assessment<ol><li>The Department of Education and FTC shall jointly commission studies on the effectiveness of educational programs, content moderation strategies, and the impact of misinformation on various age groups.</li><li>Results shall be published publicly every two years and used to refine and improve the programs established under this Act.</li></ol>Section 8. Protection of Constitutional Rights Nothing in this Act shall be construed to infringe upon the rights guaranteed under the First Amendment. All policies shall balance the protection of vulnerable populations with the preservation of free expression.Section 9. Implementation Timeline<ol><li>Platforms must comply with Section 4 within 12 months of enactment.</li><li>Educational and public awareness programs must be operational within 18 months of enactment.</li><li>Ongoing evaluation and reporting shall continue annually to ensure compliance and effectiveness.</li></ol>

<h2>Digital Literacy and Responsible Media Act of 2027</h2>

<h5>National Childcare Centers (NCCs)</h5> The federal government could create a network of childcare centers, similar to how public schools or VA hospitals are operated. These centers would be federally funded but locally managed by states or school districts. Families would only pay what it costs to run the centers, not for profit. Fees would be based on a sliding scale tied to income. Funding Sources<ul><li>Federal budget allocations, similar to public education.</li><li>Reallocation of funds from the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) and Head Start into a more universal system.</li><li>Public-private partnerships, with employers contributing to childcare costs in exchange for tax credits.Safety and Quality Federal standards would guarantee safe facilities, proper staff-to-child ratios, and strong training requirements for staff. Workers would be paid fair wages to reduce turnover. Continuous background checks, inspections, and professional development would ensure high-quality care and safety.Affordability Fees would be capped at 7% of household income, following the benchmark set by the Department of Health and Human Services. Low-income families could attend for free, while middle-income families would pay reduced rates that only cover program costs.Benefits</li></ul><ul><li>Families save thousands per year.</li><li>More parents join or stay in the workforce, boosting the economy.</li><li>Children receive safe early education that supports long-term learning and social growth.</li><li>Employers benefit as workers face fewer childcare disruptions.Pilot Program The federal government could test this idea by establishing five National Childcare Centers near Disney World in Florida. This area is ideal for a pilot program because it reflects the diverse makeup of the U.S. population. The program would run for three years before being formally evaluated.Evaluation Metrics (3-Year Review): To determine whether the program should expand nationwide, evaluators would measure:</li></ul><ul><li>Affordability: How much families saved compared to private childcare options.</li><li>Access: How many children were served, especially from low- and middle-income families.</li><li>Quality of Care: Child-to-staff ratios, safety inspections, and staff training levels.</li><li>Child Outcomes: School readiness, early literacy, and social development benchmarks.</li><li>Workforce Participation: The percentage of parents who entered or stayed in the workforce because of childcare availability.</li><li>Economic Impact: Changes in local employment, employer productivity, and overall community benefits.</li><li>Satisfaction: Surveys of parents, staff, and employers to measure confidence in the program.</li></ul>Precedents This model builds on existing programs. The U.S. military already operates high-quality, affordable Child Development Centers for service members. Head Start and Early Head Start offer childcare to low-income families, though spots are limited. Scaling these ideas nationally would provide safe, affordable childcare focused on breaking even rather than making profit.

<h2>Pilot Federal Childcare Facilities Program</h2>

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

firstName

lastName

phoneNumber

zipOrPostalCode

email

<h4>Event title here</h4>

<h4>This week, the administration quietly rolled back several tariffs it had imposed, easing affordability pressures for consumers and businesses—without acknowledging that the original tariff strategy had created unnecessary costs or strain. The United States and Taiwan formalized a trade agreement that lowers U.S. tariffs on many Taiwanese imports to a 15% rate and eliminates duties on certain goods such as fruits, spices, coffee, and specific industrial parts; in exchange, Taiwan committed to major investment in U.S. semiconductor manufacturing, strengthening economic ties and supply chains.</h4><h4> Separately, the U.S. reached a deal with Bangladesh that reduces tariffs on Bangladeshi exports to 19% and grants zero tariffs for some apparel made with U.S.-sourced materials, benefiting both export opportunities and textile sector growth.</h4><h4> In Washington, the U.S. House of Representatives took a symbolic step by voting to repeal tariffs imposed on Canadian imports, signaling growing political debate over trade policy, though the measure still faces hurdles in the Senate. </h4>

This week, the administration quietly rolled back several tariffs it had imposed, easing affordability pressures for consumers and businesses—without acknowledging that the original tariff strategy had created unnecessary costs or strain.

<h4>Tariff Update</h4>

<h4>In recent weeks, high school students across the U.S. have staged walkouts to protest actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and broader federal immigration policy. Students in states including Georgia, Indiana, Texas, Illinois, Maryland, Florida, Rhode Island, California, and across parts of the Northwest have participated in demonstrations, with events drawing hundreds to thousands of participants at individual schools. For example, more than 100 schools in Georgia reported walkouts on January 30, and hundreds of students</h4><h4>walked out in Indianapolis and Dallas in early February. Many of these actions were tied to growing concern over immigration enforcement and the impact on families and communities.</h4><h4> While administrations, state officials, and school districts have responded differently—some threatening discipline or investigations—the movement continues. Additional walkouts are being organized in states such as Maryland for events later in March, indicating the protests are not isolated and may continue as young people remain motivated to make their voices heard. </h4>

In recent weeks, high school students across the U.S. have staged walkouts to protest actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and broader federal immigration policy.

<h4>Teenagers Leading The Way</h4>

For generations, Americans have worked hard, paid their taxes, and trusted that the promises of Social Security and Medicaid would be there when they need them. These programs are not handouts — they are guarantees earned through a lifetime of work and contributions. Yet, every year, there are debates about cutting benefits, raising retirement ages, or limiting coverage. This Act makes clear: those promises will not be broken.Protecting Social Security<ul><li>No cuts, no delays, no broken promises. Retirement benefits will not be reduced, and the retirement age will not be raised.</li><li>Keep the trust fund secure. Every dollar paid into Social Security will go toward benefits, not other government spending.</li><li>Stronger future funding. High-income earners will continue paying their fair share, with adjustments to ensure the system remains solvent for decades to come.</li></ul>Protecting Medicaid<ul><li>No reduction in coverage. States cannot cut people off or reduce essential health benefits below current levels.</li><li>Funding that keeps up with reality. Federal funding must grow with inflation and population changes to meet people’s needs.</li><li>A true federal-state partnership. States will still have flexibility to improve care, but not to abandon those who depend on it.</li></ul>A Bipartisan GuaranteeThis Act requires a two-thirds vote of Congress before any cut to Social Security or Medicaid can even be considered. That means no one party can undermine these programs alone. Protecting these benefits must be a bipartisan commitment.Accountability and TransparencyEvery year, the government will release clear, public reports showing the health of Social Security and Medicaid — including how much money is in the trust funds, how many people are covered, and what steps are being taken to secure the programs for the future.The Bottom LineThe Medicaid and Social Security Protection Act makes one promise: the benefits Americans earned will always be there. Seniors, working families, children, veterans, and people with disabilities should never have to wonder if their government will keep its word.With this Act, we say clearly: Social Security and Medicaid are not up for debate. They are the foundation of America’s promise — and they will be protected.

<h2>The Medicaid and Social Security Protection Act</h2>

The purpose of this Act is to:<ol><li>Recognize the historic and cultural significance of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) as pillars of higher education and social progress in the United States.</li><li>Safeguard the financial stability, infrastructure, and academic integrity of HBCUs.</li><li>Provide direct federal investment to ensure equitable funding and support as part of the nation’s ongoing commitment to addressing systemic inequities and honoring the legacy of African American education.</li><li>Establish HBCU funding as a sustained national priority, not subject to political cycles or discretionary appropriations.</li></ol>Section 1. Definitions<ol><li>HBCU – Any institution recognized under Title III, Part B of the Higher Education Act of 1965 as a Historically Black College or University.</li><li>Reparative Education Fund (REF) – A federally managed fund established under this Act to ensure consistent, long-term investment in HBCUs.</li><li>Department – Refers to the U.S. Department of Education.</li><li>Minority-Serving Institution (MSI) – As defined under the Higher Education Act, for partnership and coordination purposes only.</li></ol>Section 2. Establishment of the Reparative Education Fund (REF)<ol><li>The REF shall be established within the U.S. Department of Education.</li><li>The REF shall receive an initial appropriation of $10 billion over a five-year period, to be distributed annually among eligible HBCUs based on enrollment, demonstrated need, and program development.</li><li>Funding shall be used for:</li><li></li></ol><ul><li>Infrastructure improvements (classrooms, laboratories, technology).</li><li>Faculty development and research initiatives.</li><li>Student scholarships and tuition assistance.</li><li>Preservation of historical archives and cultural heritage programs.</li></ul><ul><li>Funds shall not be used for administrative bonuses or non-educational expenditures unrelated to the academic mission of the institution.</li></ul>Section 3. Financial Safeguards and Oversight<ol><li>The Department shall establish a Federal HBCU Oversight Commission, composed of educators, economists, and community representatives, to monitor distribution and accountability.</li><li>Each participating HBCU shall submit an annual report detailing fund usage, outcomes, and community impact.</li><li>Annual public reports shall be submitted to Congress and made accessible online to ensure transparency.</li></ol>Section 4. Designation as a Reparative Investment<ol><li>The REF shall be recognized as part of the federal government’s reparative economic efforts to address the historical exclusion and underfunding of African American educational institutions.</li><li>Investment in HBCUs under this Act shall not replace other reparative initiatives but complement broader efforts aimed at equity in education, housing, healthcare, and economic opportunity.</li></ol>Section 5. Matching Grants and Partnerships<ol><li>Federal funds distributed through the REF may be matched by state governments, private corporations, and philanthropic organizations through the HBCU Partnership Incentive Program (HPIP).</li><li>Matching contributions will qualify for enhanced tax deductions under the Internal Revenue Code.</li><li>Partnerships must prioritize student internships, faculty exchanges, and job placement pipelines for HBCU graduates.</li></ol>Section 6. Protection of HBCU Status and Legacy<ol><li>The Department shall maintain a registry of HBCU historical sites and provide annual grants for preservation and cultural programming.</li><li>Federal law shall protect HBCUs from state-level budget reductions that disproportionately harm these institutions compared to other state-funded colleges or universities.</li></ol>Section 7. Evaluation and Reporting<ol><li>The Department, in coordination with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), shall evaluate the effectiveness of this Act every five years.</li><li>The report shall measure progress in:</li><li></li></ol><ul><li>Graduation rates and enrollment.</li><li>Campus infrastructure improvements.</li><li>Job placement and economic mobility of graduates.</li><li>Community development outcomes tied to HBCU engagement.</li></ul>Section 8. Authorization of AppropriationsThere are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this Act for each fiscal year after FY2027.Section 9. Effective DateThis Act shall take effect immediately upon passage and enactment.

<h2>HBCU Protection and Equity Investment Act of 2027</h2>

<h2>Concept Overview:</h2><img src="https://run.imgix.net/655a209d-4612-44fa-b4b6-948631052720/9f381c6b-7011-4f27-a92e-dbefa3488559/9f381c6b-7011-4f27-a92e-dbefa3488559.png?ixlib=js-3.8.0&amp;bri=0&amp;con=0&amp;sat=0&amp;high=0&amp;shad=0&amp;usm=0&amp;rect=0%2C90%2C1254%2C1030&amp;w=1500" alt="" caption="" align="center" alignwidth="25" variant="base">What the RISE Act Is: The RISE Act is a hybrid Universal Basic Income (UBI)-style income floor program designed to eliminate working poverty in the United States. It guarantees a minimum level of financial and nutritional support for Americans earning below defined income thresholds, ensuring that participation in work, education, or the economy does not result in poverty. The goal of RISE is simple: no American who is working or trying to build a life should fall below a stable standard of living.Who Qualifies: To qualify for RISE support, individuals must: * Be 18 years or older * File a federal income tax return annually * Have household per-person income below $68,000 * Be verified through IRS income reporting systems Eligibility is based on household income per person, not just individual earnings.Income Support Structure: The program uses a two-tier hybrid system that combines cash assistance with nutrition support.Tier 1: Low Income (≤ $34,000 per person) Individuals and households in this tier receive full support: * Up to $16,000 per year total &nbsp; &nbsp; $8,000 in direct cash payments &nbsp; &nbsp; $8,000 in SNAP-based nutrition benefits This ensures both financial stability and food security.Tier 2: Moderate Income ($34,001 – $68,000 per person) * Gradual reduction of benefits as income increases * Combination of reduced cash and reduced nutrition support * Smooth phase-out with no sudden cutoff This ensures that earning more does not create a sudden loss of assistance.Tier 3: Above $68,000 per person * No eligibility for RISE benefitsKey Features of RISE:Hybrid Support Model Combines: * Cash assistance for flexibility * Nutrition support for stability<h4>Work-Friendly Design</h4> RISE is structured to: * Support workers, students, and job transitions * Avoid penalizing increased earnings * Encourage upward mobilityTax-Based System: * Eligibility determined automatically through IRS filings * No separate application system required * Annual income verification ensures accuracy<h4>Poverty Reduction Goal</h4> RISE is designed to: * Eliminate working poverty * Stabilize income for low-income households * Strengthen local economies through predictable consumer spendingCore Principle: Every American contribution to society should be met with a baseline of dignity, stability, and opportunity.<h2> How the RISE Act Is Funded: The RISE Act is supported by a diversified funding model that spreads responsibility across federal savings, targeted taxes, and small nationwide contributions.</h2>1. Military Budget Reallocation * $200 billion annually redirected from defense spending efficiencies * Focused on reallocating redundant or lower-priority expenditures toward domestic economic stability2. ICE Budget Standardization * ICE operational budget set at a baseline of $8 billion * Efficiency savings redirected into the RISE program3. Progressive Wealth Contribution Adjustment * Tiered contribution increases for high-income earners: &nbsp; &nbsp;* 0.25% to 1.0% for incomes above $500,000 annually4. Digital Infrastructure Contribution Tax * Contributions from large-scale data centers and digital infrastructure companies5. Federal Hotel &amp; Lodging Contribution * $1 per-night tax on all hotel and motel stays nationwide This generates an estimated: $1.1–$1.3 billion annually A small, broad-based contribution from the travel and tourism economy that helps support national income stability.6. SNAP &amp; Welfare Integration Savings * Partial consolidation of overlapping federal assistance programs * Reduced administrative duplication through IRS-based eligibility verificationSummary The RISE Act creates a national income floor system that: * Provides up to $16,000 in combined support * Targets Americans earning under $68,000 per person * Uses a hybrid cash + nutrition model * Supports work, education, and mobility * Is funded through a combination of: &nbsp; &nbsp; defense reallocation &nbsp; &nbsp; immigration enforcement efficiency &nbsp; &nbsp; wealth contributions &nbsp; &nbsp; digital economy taxation &nbsp; &nbsp;* and a $1 per-night hotel contribution

Revenue Income Support &amp; Empowerment:&nbsp; A National Income Floor for Working Americans

<h2>R.I.S.E Act</h2>

<h4>Democratic Congressional District 11 Forum</h4>

Hear directly from candidates as they discuss they discuss the key issues impacting daily lives and share their plans for addressing them.A meet and greet with the candidates will follow the forum

Democratic Congressional District 11 Forum

Elect Royal Webster

electroyalwebster.com

IconCheckCircle1

Check Circle 1

Gamay is published by <a href="https://www.dardenstudio.com/gamay" target="_new">Darden Studio</a>. <a href="mailto:office@dardenstudio.com">Contact them</a> to recieve a 50% off discount for use of the fonts outside of your Run website.

Visit Our blog page

Royal's Weekly Brief

Royal’s Recap: Seven Bites Out of the News Cycle

In a world of nonstop headlines, more information isn’t always better. Royal’s Recap offers seven carefully chosen updates each week—stories that matter, stories that may have flown under the radar, and stories that help you understand what’s really happening beyond the headlines.

Cuba Crisis

Education Under Attack Again

Sumter Farms Grant Snag

Tariff Update

Virginia’s Law

Lowering ICE Training Standards

Teenagers Leading The Way

Royal’s Recap will continue to monitor these developments and provide concise, fact-based updates on the issues that matter and might have been less reported.